Who was the First Trumpian President? = Thomas Jefferson – The Killer of Rogue, Activist, Lawfare and Lawless Democrat Party Judges

“The more things change, the more they stay the same.”

~ Alphonse Karr [1808-90] (French Critic, Journalist & Novelist)

PROLOGUE — Going down the Rabbit Hole of Alice in Wonderland . . . (And how to come back out again?)

 

*N.B.: This Prologue is taken in part from my 8-part essay and poem series on a mentor of mine from back in the day, former Chief Judge Richard A. POSNER which was published in my critical thinking blog: www.ElisWashingtonReport.com. 

 

 

In February 1-10, 2025, I rewrote and extensively revised my first original 4 Essays and Poems on my antagonist, Chief Judge Richard A. POSNER (born 11 Jan. 1939)(7th Circuit Court of Appeals—1981-2017) and added 4 more essays and 4 more poems where are all numbered consecutively with Roman numerals. Admittedly, Judge Posner is arguably the most famous, respected and celebrated Judge of all time. As I stated above Judge Posner is considered – “The 10th Justice of the Supreme Court” and “The most cited jurist of the 20th century and of all time by law journals and by SCOTUS”).

But listen to me my dear little Children, because there is a VERY IMPORTANT caveat here… Judge Richard A. Posner is the most celebrated, famous and most-cited Judge in Wonderland = THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., a corporate dictatorship owned and operated by the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia, aka the Central Bankers who created the Federal Reserve Banking Cabal to print their worthless currency and to control and enslave the economies of every Nation in the World! The Rothschild Central Bankers have held over 350,000,000

Americans as Chattel Slaves and Debt Slaves for 150 Years [1871-2021] until President Donald J. TRUMP broke the Chattel and Debt Slave chains and set U.S. Free by restoring America’s original “REPUBLIC …, if you can keep it.” #BenjaminFranklin; #DCActof1871 

Always remember Aristotle’s Rule of “First Principles” – Here it is restated as a cautionary allegory of Modern times —

Morpheus to Neo: “Everything they told you was a [Big] Lie.”

      ~ Movie: The Matrix {Construct Scene} (Part I: 1999) 

What does this mean in the context of Judge Posner and the current controversy of Leftist District Court judges filing injunctions against virtually every policy initiative President Trump tries to enact according to the mandate of the electorate who put him in power in the first place? It means that this Leftist, Activist, Lawless Judge who served 36 years on the bench [1981-2017] was (despite his nomination by “Mr. Conservative” President Ronald Reagan), history has proven Posner to be an Arrogant, Rogue, Activist, Lawless and a Lawfare Judge until Judge Posner was forced to RESIGN by President Donald J. Trump in just 9 months into Trump’s first term in office due to Judge Posner’s “Pro Se Center” fraud scandal and a growing neurogenerative Alzheimer’s disease and Dementia that increasingly deconstructed and degenerated his brain which ultimately sent him to a Senior Citizens home by 2022.

Yet, ironically Judge Posner’s naked, arrogant Judicial activism isn’t without precedent. I called Judge Posner the King of all Rogue, Activist, Lawfare judges of Modern times. However, this dubious distinction really belongs to the jurist who was responsible for giving powers to the third branch of Government–the Judiciary, some may say that now exceeds the powers of the Legislative and Executive Branches. That man was Thomas Jefferson’s distant cousin and our fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court [1801-35], John Marshall (1755-1835).

Let’s see how Marshall invented “Judicial Review” as the primary judicial mechanism that overtime seized powers that the Founding Fathers never intended the Judiciary to have, nor weld. Exhibit A: Jefferson’s famous letter to a friend in 1820, just 17 years after the passage of what President Jefferson considered the infamous Marbury v. Madison 1 U.S. (Cranch) 137 (1803) decision.

Chromo Podcast, Speaker Johnson Shuts Down Woke Anti-Trump Judges (27 March 2025)

CRHOMO: The tides are starting to turn for these corrupt judges that think they can rule by judiciary because Speaker Mike Johnson just put the judiciary in check.

MEDIA: House Speaker Mike Johnson issuing an open threat now saying that Congress has authority to stop providing funding to federal courts. Listen to what the Speaker said a little while ago –

Congress must Defund all Rogue District Courts to Maintain the Rule of Law

SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON: We do have authority over the Federal Courts as you know. We can eliminate an entire district court. We have the power of funding over all courts and all these other things, but desperate times calls for desperate measures and Congress is going to act so stay tuned for that.

CHROMO: I guess that’s why they call it checks and balances. (See Matt MorseTV, Trump just outsmarted the corrupt Federal Judges)

MEDIA: Jay, let’s get right to it. This is all centered around the Alien Enemies Act [1798] and whether [illegal Alien] deportations fall under the president’s Article 2 Powers.

CHROMO: No it’s not! Judge have been stopping nearly every executive action that the Trump administration has been trying to make including demanding that the Trump administration continue accepting potentially dangerous refugees.

MEDIA: So, what’s the reaction in Congress now to what the Speaker just said today? Well, there are Republicans up here on the Hill, Kira, who want [Speaker] Johnson, frankly, to go further and support impeaching judges who politically shown that they uh, or not politically, rather but legally show that they disagree with the administration.

CHROMO: Little bit of a Freudian slip there, bud. And it ended up being a little prophetic because the Ninth Circuit Court stepped in. Surprise! Liberal 9th Circuit Court overturns Biden ruling requiring Trump Administration to continue accepting new and potentially dangerous refugees. And that’s not the only activist judge to get a judicial smackdown from the higher courts. You guys remember USAID, right? You remember that judge that said, “Hey, you can’t stop those payments.”

JOSH HAMMER (Newsweek Editor): Now, this exact case that Chief Justice Roberts stepped in last night. It’s from Washington, DC. is from a district court judge named Amir Ali and the so-called temporary restraining order in question basically would purport to require the Trump administration to continue the slush fund of all foreign contracts and contractors billions and billions of dollars when it comes to the State Department and USAID.

CHROMO: We, I guess Chief Justice Roberts was feeling the pressure because the dude finally got up off of his laurels.

JOSH HAMMER (Newsweek Editor): So, last night Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court basically stepped in for the first time from what I can tell to swat down one of these lower court judicial insurrectionists who was trying to bring the entirety of the Trump administration to a halt. So what I put on X was I said: “Chief Justice Roberts to lower court to judicial insurrection FAFO (= F*** Around, Find out)–

 

{SCOTUS Blog Headline} Chief Justice pauses order for Trump to pay $2 billion in foreign-aid funding. 

JOSH HAMMER (Newsweek Editor): This is all coming to a halt and it’s about time that the Supreme Court finally, finally, finally swat away [Rogue, Partisan, Lawless, Activist] District Court Judges.

CHROMO: And thank God he did to because we’re almost at a constitutional crisis with these judges just straight up ignoring the law. 

JOSH HAMMER (Newsweek Editor): Even on these specifics here, you can’t even issue a temporary restraining order when it comes to an executive order in the first place. That’s actually not how administrative law works… You need a final agency action from, let’s call it the State Department there. That didn’t happen here. They’re trying to sue just an executive order. So, it’s wrong on the actual substantive underlying law. And you know, this is what many of us have been calling for weeks.

CHROMO: People have been calling for [impeachment of all Rogue, Lawless Judges] for so much longer than a few weeks. What if I told you guys that this struggle that we’re seeing right now with this judicial overreach and this attempt to rule by judiciary? …

JOSH HAMMER (Newsweek Editor): Well, what we’re seeing is not just judicial activism, Steve… This is a full-on Judicial insurrection.

CHROMO: What if this has all happened before in a striking similar way to what we’re seeing play out right now? If you are interested in how far this rabbit hole goes and the role it played in shaping our entire political culture in this country?… It turns out that the Judiciary was trying to take over this country so early on in our history that THE FIRST TRUMPIAN PRESIDENT WAS THE THIRD PRESIDENT [THOMAS JEFFERSON (1801-09)] WE EVER ELECTED. Just let that sink in because the way history repeats itself and how closely it resembles previous cycles, it just blows my mind sometimes.

 

A BRIEF DOCUMENTARY ON THE ELECTION OF 1800

INTRODUCTION: The election in which Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams for president has been called The “Revolution of 1800” and the “Midnight Judges”. Because that year control of the Executive Branch shifted from the Federalists to the Democratic-Republican Party. Up until 1800 Federalists had always controlled the presidency. After the election of Thomas Jefferson, a revolutionary new set of ideals based on a smaller role for the federal government went into effect. 

CHROMO: Is it just me or are the similarities already taking effect? Smaller role for the federal government, Tea Party, MAGA. 

DOCUMENTARY: John Adams realized that the loss of the presidency meant that his party’s influence had been drastically reduced. And so, he used his remaining weeks in office appointing judges who held strong Federalist views so that Federalist ideals would be preserved long into the future. These appointees came to be called the “Midnight Judges” (e.g., Midnight Judges Act, Judiciary Act of 1801).

MINORITY LEADER SENATOR SCHUMER: The good news here is, we did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time. And we hope that the appellate courts, when they get up there, and the Supreme Court, will uphold those rulings. They restored the money to NIH. They required that 8,000 federal employees have to come back. We’re in over a hundred lawsuits against them and we are having a good deal of success. It’s only at the lower court level right now.

SENATOR SCHUMER BRAGING ON PACKING THE COURT WITH 235 ROGUE, ACTIVIST, LAWFARE, LAWLESS DEMOCRAT JUDGES

 

 

DOCUMENTARY: One of these men, John Marshall [Thomas Jefferson’s cousin] would serve as the powerful Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for 34 years. And it was under Marshall’s guidance that the U.S. Supreme Court finally achieved the same level of power possessed by the Executive and Legislative Branches of government

CHROMO: Wow! So that’s how Judiciary even became as powerful as it is today? Isn’t that crazy? And what people don’t even realize is it goes a layer deeper than that. Have y’all heard the calls recently for a Constitutional Convention saying, Oh, we need one now.

MEDIA: Conservative activists have applauded Trump’s efforts to expand presidential powers and there’s a lawsuit that has been drafted to force Congress to call a convention to amend the Constitution. That is according to Phoebe Petravich who authored a new ProPublica about this. She writes, “That over a dozen state attorneys general and Republican controlled state legislatures have been given a copy of the draft lawsuit.

CHROMO: Well, what if I told you, it’s been done before And, it’s how we got stuck with this over bloated judiciary in the first place.

MEDIA: Most of us know the story. Once upon a time, some American colonists got together in 1776 and overthrew the strongest, most powerful nation on earth, Great Britain, in the American Revolution. Now, from 1776-87, the first decade of American history, we were run under a framework of a Constitution called the Articles of Confederation. It’s a very loose Confederation of States. There is an immense fear of centralized power that power corrupts.

CHROMO: And that’s why during those first 10 years the federal government had no standing army, couldn’t tax its citizens. There was only a Congress. There was no Senate. There was no judiciary. It was extremely limited in its scope. 

MEDIA: And then the story goes that Shay’s Rebellion and Insurrection is going to lead to a fear that this weak central government can’t handle itself, that we need a stronger union.

CHROMO: … We’re at 1787. Everybody knows about the Federalists. 

 

HISTORIAN: We have a tendency to puff up the Federalists and deflate or ignore the Antifederalists. And that is absolutely a mistake because if the Federalists had their political and intellectual heavyweights, the Anti-Federalists weren’t a bunch of intellectual and political slouches. The Anti-Federalists base of support tended to be the opposite of what we found with the Federalists. You know, farmers are more likely to be Anti-Federalists than lawyers and merchants. Anti-Federalists state-by-state tended to have more support in the west and so outside of the cities rather than in the eastern part of states. And so again, the Anti-Federalists base of support in more rural areas than in towns and cities

CHROMO: So Federalists were urbanizing, and Anti-Federalists were people from rural areas. The urbanites wanted more central government authority and the people from the country wanted less. I’m getting Deja vous.

HISTORIAN: Their ideas were also powerful. They’re ones that if you go back, you read something like Brutus’s essays, (Anti-Federalist Essay #16) you’ll hear a lot of what Brutus says resonates with what we still debate today in America. Because in many ways, the battle over ratification was all about the debate over where you place political power in the United States or big debates over Federalism. 

How much power do you give to the national government? How much power do you give to the state and local governments? And for the Anti-Federalists, their big concern was that the new US Constitution was going to give too much power to the national government and take away too much power from the state and local governments, the governments that the Anti-Federalists thought were closest to the people. 

And so their argument generally was that this new Constitution that was going to let the national government seize all political power, swallow up the states, abuse the rights of their people, and ultimately that this was the road to tyranny.

CHROMO: Isn’t that crazy? – 250 years and we circled right back around to where we started.

Epilogue—Why the more things change, the more things stay the same is an accurate portrayal of Human History down through the Ages?

Meet The Democrat Activist Lawfare Judges Making Unprecedented Efforts to Shut Down Trump’s Agenda

 

 

Tragically, after years of research, I now believe and understand that Chief Judge Richard A. Posner was from the beginning a Fake, Rogue Lawfare, Lawless Judge for 36 years on the Appellate bench, and a Renegade, Marxist Lecturer in Law, and a Hitlerian Big Lie Academic for nearly 55 years!

 In a March 5th decision issuing 5-4 ruling by SCOTUS against President Trump’s and DOGE efforts to cut waste-fraud-abuse in federal government spending, the 4 women of SCOTUS (including their traitor Amy Coney Barrett whom Trump appointed) + Chief Justice [Pedo] John Roberts unconstitutionally ruled that President Trump must send $2 billion previously withheld USAID funds as foreign aid even though the initial grant was obviously based on fraud, corruption and was a naked attempt by the Democrat Party at money laundering, this stolen tax money by We the People back into the pockets of the politicians who passed these “grants” in the first place. 

QUESTION?–In 2025 Why do we have these Leftist, Lawless, Lawfare women Justices on SCOTUS [e.g., Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson] if they rarely if ever uphold the Rule of Law and the U.S. Constitution verses spewing their irrelevant  “Personal Policy Preferences” = Emotive Judicial Decisionmaking = TREASON!

 

 In other words in my humble opinion, Judge Posner was a #MKUltraMindControl #ManchurianCandidate (= a Servile Puppet, a Plant, a Spy, an ‘Agent Provocateur‘) illegally and unconstitutionally installed and propped up by the CIA-FBI-Mossad and DEEP STATE agents that hate America and together with the Globalist Satanic New World Order, are sworn to America’s destruction.

 

*

WHY Does the CIA-Deep State install Manchurian Candidates like–Justice O.W. Holmes, FDR, LBJ, The Clintons, Resident Barack Obama, Resident Biden and Judge Richard Posner and other “Manchurian Candidates” throughout History?

 

= To Dissemble [e.g., to Big Lie about and slander, to discredit and to ultimately to destroy others who tell the TRUTH], to Deconstruct and to Destroy Law Schools (and all ‘Higher’ and ‘Lower’) Education, to pervert the U.S. Constitution and destroy the Rule of Law through his prolific and Machiavellian output = 40 Books, 500 Law Journal Articles, 3,000+ Judicial Opinions as – “The most-cited jurist of the 20th century and of all time by law journals and by SCOTUS.”

 “The devil has infiltrated the University and academic environment with Satanism to the point that many University teachers have joined the Occult.” (See, A Spiritual Master, Part 2 – beg.@0:12). Perhaps for over 100 years or more (but really since the 1500s) intelligence agencies like the FBI, CIA (OSS), NSA, Mossad, MI-5, MI-6 and before them many others including the Vatican and the Jesuits (Council of Trent [1545-63]), have infiltrated every institution in American society, especially the Academy and lower [K-12] education as their sworn first Catholic Counter Reformation [1545-1648] Mandate according to Ignatius Loyola [1491-1556], the Father of the Jesuits and the Catholic Counter Reformation. I believe that at the Council of Trent saw the creation of the International B.A.R. [British Accreditation Registry] Association, which would latter prove so vital in secret Catholic hegemony over all cultural and political, educational and societal institutions, would have its genesis from the 1500s to this day… Worldwide!

Why? Because the best and most efficient way to control 350,000,000 Americans is recruit and train students from the Ivy League, the Public Ivy League and the “Hidden” Ivy League Schools and other elite colleges and universities who have sociopathic and psychopathic tendencies, next the CIA blackmail them (usually with so-called ‘Honey pot’) situations to control them, and then the CIA installs them into elite and leadership positions throughout society. Thus, to control 340,000,000 people, you just need about 5-10,000 people to install in leadership-controlled positions across the country.  #CIA-MKUltraMindControl; #InvaisionThroughInfiltration; #OrdoAbChao

However, in the Democrat Socialist Party’s nearly 200-year Conspiracy against the American people to seize power for their Globalist masters over We the People, Judge Posner, and the Deep State Democrats, and New World Order Globalist Traitors only made ONE mistake…?  They  picked  wrong political  party  to  support. . . *N.B.: [The Democrat Party is not a real political party at all, but is actually a False Satanic RELIGIOUS CULT that was founded and formed in 1828], nearly 200 years ago.

*

 

The Mis-Educated, arrogant Leftists never understood this Awesome power of VERITAS = TRUTH = “IN THE END GOD WINS”… Therefore, in these 4 Poems I use Children’s Fairytales like, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll, and The Emperor’s New Clothes by Hans Christian Anderson, and other fairytales and poems to expose this Immoral, Renegade, Leftist, Activist, Democrat Judge Richard A. POSNER with the TRUTH for our YOUTH…

“… And it came to pass… that Chief Judge Richard Posner has no more judicial robes to bolster his fame, No more Christian Minister’s robes to hide his shame.” …

 

In conclusion, We the People (not unelected Judges) are the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions not specifically delineated in the U.S. Constitution or in the Bill of Rights. That’s why the constitutional Framers wrote what should have been termed The Bill of [NATURAL] Rights for it is in this section, particularly in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments that the unstated Natural Rights (which are very numerous and belong to We the People) are implied and that government power (which is stated in the U.S. Constitution, including the powers of the Courts) are few and specifically defined.

 

Tags: constitutional framers, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, featured, judges, Posner, supreme court, Thomas Jefferson

Category: Commentary