Democrat Party Racism, Corporate Personhood, and the Right to Bear Arms Against Government Democide—Part I
| About the Author—Professor Ellis Washington, J.D.—I went to Harvard Law School with future POTUS Barack Hussein Obama for 1 year (1988-89), but I took the opposite path in Life—New World Order, Communism, Treason, Pedophilia & Satanic Ritual Abuse vs. Christianity, Conservatism, Protecting the Children & TRUMPism. I repeatedly refused to take the “Satan OATH” which is why I’ve been blacklisted for 30+ years—for my entire legal and academic career, yet I Fight on! Why?—For Harvard’s original 1692 motto—Veritas pro Christo et Ecclesia {= Truth for Christ and the Church}. To escape the 150-Year Rothschild Chattel Slavery systems (e.g., Birth certificates, Social Security numbers bought, sold & traded on Wall Street) & Rothschild Debt Slavery systems (e.g., IRS, Income Taxes, fiat/counterfeit currency based on NOTHING, printed to fund false flag wars) of the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia Matrix (1871-2021), read and share the Truth of my Critical Thinking blog with the Youth that’s nearing 20 Million views @ EllisWashingtonReport.com & on Facebook — #JesusIsLord #DCActof1871 |
“… [T]he current executive vice president, warned members in 1995 that anyone who wears a badge has “the government’s go-ahead to harass, intimidate, even murder law-abiding citizens.”
~ NRA, Wayne LaPierre (1995)
“The right to bear arms has mostly been for white people.”
~Prof. Adam Winkler, The Washington Post (15 July 2016)
Democide is a term proposed by R. J. Rummel since at least 1994 who defined it as “the intentional killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity and pursuant to government policy or high command.“
~ Wikipedia
Prologue—Essay Request from Brian, Editor of Sorcha Faal
A few weeks ago, I had sent one of my lecture review essays on the Civil War to Brian, Editor of that revelatory, iconoclast news site, WhatDoesItMean. His response below requested that I write an essay regarding the legal conflicts between Corporate Personhood and the Second Amendment. The essay has an emphasis on the history of this Amendment and the racist and racialist manner the Second Amendment was used throughout history to discriminate against and disenfranchise Black people from owing firearms – while ironically due to that same racial discrimination history condemned a large majority of Black Americans to live inside or near Big City ghettos controlled largely by Democrat Machine Politics for the past 50-100 years – NO GO ZONES where gun violence and existential despair reigns unmolested due to gangs, drugs, poverty, ignorance and crime has exploded exponentially since the 1960s golden era of race riots – a outrageous state of affairs that continues to plague American society to this day.
The grotesque irony here is that Democrat Party racism was largely responsible for disarming Black people as far back to the Slavery Era (1619-1865); even free Blacks during the Slavery Era generally couldn’t carry guns. And Democrat Party racism kept Blacks most vulnerable to gun violence during the Civil Rights Era (1865-1965) right up to modern times with the SCOTUS gun cases – Heller v. D.C. (2008), Citizens United v. FEC (2010) and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) – recent cases where the majority of Black Americans to this day are still not protected by their government, but are largely disarmed and corralled into Concentration Camps euphemistically called “Ghettos”—subject to various “General Welfare” policies by Democrat Progressives which historically have amounted to various forms of democide against Black America.
Here’s the original essay request from Brian —
| Dear Prof. Washington, Thank you for your kind words of support, and I can assure you that in the near future, your works will be referenced to our readers in an upcoming report. If you don’t mind a respectful question though, and due to the Sisters being gravely concerned about the continued genocide of black babies in America from abortion, are either you personally, or your organization, willing to aid those black peoples needing the protections of your nation’s Second Amendment? Specifically, under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations (corporate personhood), is this type of entity afforded Second Amendment protection? Though indeed scant, American case law [Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. (1886)— Dartmouth College v. Woodward in (1819)— Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014)]—seems to suggest this is so, but I’ve yet to find if this issue has been firmly decided. I believe that if the Second Amendment protections do apply to corporations there can be created corporate entities owning firearms which their shareholder-citizens are allowed to use for protection—specifically those shareholders currently living under gun restriction tyranny, but whose guns would be held by their corporations legally existing in nearby localities whose gun laws are less restrictive. For example: the black citizens of Chicago could be shareholders in a gun-corporation in nearby Indiana whose laws for a License to Carry permit allow non-residents to have them—thus enabling them to enjoy reciprocal carry permit rights with many other states in which they may wish to travel. If you’d be so kind, and you have the time, please explore this issue further—with your keeping in mind that the massive publicity you’d receive from those opposing this will cause them to descend upon you with everything they have—that won’t include President Trump or any of his federal judges eagerly awaiting such a monumental case to begin. All the best, Brian |
1967-YEAR ONE for Gun Disarmament – Gov. Ronald Reagan vs. The Black Panthers – Guess Who Was for Gun Rights?
In an interesting 2011 article published in The Atlantic Adam Winkler, Professor of Constitutional Law at UCLA, set the narrative for how the Age of Modern Gun Control Movement was born –
“The eighth-grade students gathering on the west lawn of the state capitol in Sacramento were planning to lunch on fried chicken with California’s new governor, Ronald Reagan, and then tour the granite building constructed a century earlier to resemble the nation’s Capital. But the festivities were interrupted by the arrival of 30 young black men and women carrying .357 Magnums, 12-gauge shotguns, and .45-caliber pistols. The 24 men and six women climbed the capitol steps, and one man, Bobby Seale, began to read from a prepared statement. “The American people in general and the black people in particular,” he announced, must”
| take careful note of the racist California legislature aimed at keeping the black people disarmed and powerless. Black people have begged, prayed, petitioned, demonstrated, and everything else to get the racist power structure of America to right the wrongs which have historically been perpetuated against black people The time has come for black people to arm themselves against this terror before it is too late. |
Seale then turned to the others. “All right, brothers, come on. We’re going inside.” He opened the door, and the radicals walked straight into the state’s most important government building, loaded guns in hand. No metal detectors stood in their way. It was May 2, 1967, and the Black Panthers’ invasion of the California statehouse launched the modern gun-rights movement.” ~Prof. Adam Winkler, The Atlantic Monthly (2011)
“The Nazi Roots of Gun Control”
If 1967 was Year One for Democrat Party obsession to disarm law-abiding Americans and to deconstruct their beloved Second Amendment guaranteeing their God-given right to protect ourselves from a tyrannical and democidal government, then 1968 was the year of the first federal policy initiatives to achieve that Orwellian objective (Republican Ronald Reagan having passed then America’s most draconian state gun-control as Gov. of California [e.g., The Mulford Act, 1967]). Here is a passage from one of my more popular essays regarding the treacherous origins of all modern gun-control laws – The Nazi Roots of U.S. Gun-Control Laws (WND.com, 2012) –
| “It is very probable that it was none other than [one of the U.S. Nuremberg Trial Lawyers] Sen. Thomas Dodd who brought copies of the 1938 Nazi German Weapons Law, had that language literally translated and copied into America’s 1968 Gun Control Act, which would explain why the two laws are almost identical. History tells us that the 1938 Nazi law facilitated the disenfranchisement, imprisonment and murder of millions of Jews and millions of other Untermensch (sub-humans, undesirables). The 1968 Gun Control Act has already led to the disenfranchisement of our Second Amendment rights, imprisonment and the needless maiming and murder of countless citizens who, due to liberal fascist anti-gun policies, could not lawfully use a firearm to defend themselves.” ~ Ellis Washington |
We the Corporations (2018) – How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights
The history of the Supreme Court interpreting the Constitution to grant “personhood” to corporations was beginning to become settled by SCOTUS 10 years after the end of Radical Reconstruction Era. Tracing the history of “Corporate Personhood” Adam Winkler, Professor of Constitutional Law at UCLA, wrote that “In December 1882, Roscoe Conkling… appeared before the justices of the Supreme Court… to argue that corporations like his client, the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, were entitled to equal rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. Although that provision of the Constitution said that no state shall “deprive any person… “or “deny to any person…”
By the early 1880s the Court had not yet granted corporate personhood – at least not in the manner we understand this legal concept in modern times, attorney Conkling’s legal theories regarding Corporate Personhood were merely cited a dicta in an obscure headnote in the final Court opinion published in 1886, nevertheless, like many landmark Supreme Court decisions, cases where the so-called minority opinion in one case often becomes the majority in another – oftentimes soon thereafter. For example, Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Lochner v. New York (1905), Abrams v. U.S. (1919), Schenck v. U.S. (1919), Gitlow v. New York (1925), Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Caroline Products v. U.S. (1938) – with its famous/infamous “Footnote 4” – deconstructive dicta written by Justice Harlan F. Stone that 6 years later (when FDR threaten to pack the Court with Socialist/Activist Justices) suddenly became the leading opinion in Korematsu v. U.S. (1944).
*N.B.: Several of the cases cited above (e.g., Lochner, Abrams, Schenck, & Gitlow) were eventually made landmark decisions despite the fact that originally these cases were minority opinions written by the champion of what Justice Scalia in a debate with his SCOTUS colleague, Justice Breyer, derisively referred to as “Evolutionary Jurisprudence” – where the judge ignores the original intent of the Legislator or prior Court precedent (stare decisis) and illegitimately inserts his own “Personal Policy Preferences.” Of course, the jurist I speak of is perhaps the most famous Progressive/Darwinist Justice in American jurisprudence history—Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (SCOTUS: 1902-32). I wrote a comprehensive legal analysis of Justice Holmes life and the law titled, I wrote a comprehensive legal analysis of Justice Holmes life and the law titled, 1918-2018: 100 Years of UnNatural Law of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Qui bono – Who benefits? In my opinion the biggest beneficiaries of the 200-year deconstruction of American Constitutional Law and societal morality has been Leviathan ‘Big’ Government, the Deep State traitors and their fake, servile, duplicitous “Evolutionary” judges we euphemistically refer to as Leftist/Activist Judges or Judicial Legislators. How? The more you pervert the law and divorce it from morality and from Biblical principles that do not change (what the Constitutional Framers called “Natural Law” & “Natural Rights”), then the less predictable and reliable the law becomes as in the worldview of Evolutionary and “Living Constitution” Jurists consider law as always being what Justice Holmes defined as being “in a constant state of flux.” (Washington, Reply to Jg. Posner, 10)
Thus, once legality and morality are fully separated, then the Deep State, Shadow Government, Globalist Gestapo can sweep in establish a one-party Communist State and make Conservatives and Libertarians, Christians and Christianity a relic of the past as they are trying to do now by all of the Technocracy Tyrants enthusiastically are adopting China’s Communist “Social Credit Score” system where unless you bow down and worship of the Communist State then your connection to the Internet, travel, housing, food, clothing, water and all of the modern necessities of life can be taken away from you as punishment. For example, TARGET #1 = Alex Jones and InfoWars.com who on 6 Aug. 2018 was the first to be deplatformed by this totalitarian Communist Social Credit Score scheme gleefully weaponized here in AMERICA by Google, Facebook, YouTube & Apple. Related Breaking News that I hope is not true, posted recently on InfoWars.com – Trump Administration Considering Social Credit Score System to Determine Who Can Buy a Gun.
Such is the case of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, where “Conkling insisted the… drafters intended to cover business corporations too. …The Fourteenth Amendment had been adopted after the Civil War to guarantee the rights of freed slaves, not to protect corporations. Conkling, however, had unusual credibility… If anyone could testify to the intent of the… drafters, it was Conkling, who was one himself. …Conkling produced a musty, never-before-published journal that purported to detail his committee’s deliberations. …There was just one small problem with Conkling’s account of the drafting… it was not true,” according to Professor Winkler.
A critical question boils down to this corollary and battle of interests — Government vs. Corporations (People). Laying aside the legal question of whether corporations are people until the next section, consider the “checks and balance” of using the legal non-entity or legal fiction of “Corporations” – imbuing them with personhood and then using this new legal fiction “Person” as a check and balance against the tyrannical nature of Big Government Socialism in America, while at the same time opening the equivalent of a Niagara Falls of limitless vocational job opportunities that can ensure real (not government-contrived ‘Civil Rights’ or egalitarianism), but Natural Rights founded in God-given Natural Law at the dawn of the Second Industrial Revolution in 1880s America.
See Part II for the Conclusion of this legal analysis.
Category: Commentary
